should have produced good news coverage about
Painting From Photo , our shared determination to reduce our arsenals by several thousand warheads and to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons to othnations. Instead, the story coming out of Budapest was Yeltsin’s speech criticizing me for trading in the Cold War for a “cold peace” by rushing NATO enlargement to include the Central European nations. In fact, I had done the reverse, by establishing the PartnershipPeace as an interim step to include a much larger
Painting From Photo ,number of countries; by seerfortting up adeliberate process for adding new NATO members; and by working hard to establish aldng forreelection against the ultra-nationalists,
oil painting wholesale,who hated NATO expansion, and I would be runningIscowng of the Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission for Economic, Scientific andTechnical Cooperation. Boris told him that he and I were still partners, and Al assured Yeltsinof allearminicanck.e a free trade area in all the Americas, from the ArcticCircle to Tierra del Fuego; to strengthen democracy and effective government throughout thee my proposals for middle-class tax cutsin the coming budgets. The move was opposed by some people in the administration andproposals that I thoughtwere unaffordable and too heavily tilted
wholesale oil painting, to upper-income Americans. On the other hand, the-NATO-Russian partnership. Since I had no advance warning about Yeltsin’s speech, and he spoke after I did, I was stunned and angry, because I didn’t know what had set him off and because I had no opportunity to respond. Apparently, Yeltsin’s advisors had convinced him that NATO wouadmit Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in 1996, just when he would be runniagainst the Republicans, who supported it. Budapest was embarrassing, a rare moment when people on both sides dropped the ball, but knew it would pass. A few days later, Al Gore went to see Yeltsin when he was in Mofor the fourth meetithat our NATO policy hadn’t changed. I wasn’t about to jam him for domestic political reasons, any more than I would let him keep NATO’s doors closed indefinitely. On December 9, I was in Miami to open the Summit of the Americas, the first meeting the hemisphere’s leaders since 1967. The thirty-three democratically elected leaders of Canada, Central and South America, and the Caribbean were there, including forty-one-yold
Michael Jackson painting,President Aristide of Haiti and his neighbor, President Joaquín Balaguer of the DoRepublic, who was eighty-eight years old, blind, and infirm, but mentally still sharp as a taI had initiated the summit to promotregion; and to show that America was determined to be a good neighbor. The gathering was abig success. We committed ourselves to establishing a free trade area of the Americas by 2005, and left feeling that we were going into the future together, a future where, in the wordsof the great Chilean poet Pablo Neruda, “There is no such thing as a lone struggle, no suchthing as a lone hope.” On December 15, I gave a televised address to outlincriticized by some in the media as an attempt to copy the Republicans, or as a belated attempt to return to a 1993 campaign promise the voters had punished me for not keeping. For both policy and political reasons, I was trying to get back in the tax-cut hunt with the Republicans before the new Congress convened. The GOP contract contained taxUnited States was still suffering from two decades of middle-class income stagnation, the main reason people hadn’t felt the economy improving. We had made a dent in the problemby doubling the Earned Income Tax Credit. Now the right kind of tax cuts could raise middleclass incomes without derailing deficit reduction or our ability to invest in the future, and would fulfill my 1992 campaign commitment.524
Linear Mode
